During the Korean and Vietnam wars the ides of evacuating casualties by aircraft became practical. As the countries Emergency Medical Services system grew and evolved the use of aircraft became an integral part of treating the most seriously sick or injured among us.
As the system evolved many flight programs entered the arena. These programs have provided years of safe and reliable service to those in need. Unfortunately the past several years have brought safety concerns to the forefront of the industry. In august of 2005 the NTSB published a report highlighting air medical safety concerns. In this report 55 accidents were analyzed. These 55 accidents occurred from January 2002 until January 2005, and several lessons learned were published. The report established the following recommendations.
All Air Medical Flights should be conducted under FAR part 135
Aviation flight risk evaluation programs should be implemented
Consistent coordinated flight dispatch program including aviation weather capabilities should be utilized
Use of technologies such as terrain awareness, and warning systems should be adopted.
Since this 2005 report was filed no formal implementation of these recommendations has been required. With no change in policy, mindset, or culture accidents continue to happen. In the last 11 months there have been nine more fatal air medical accidents. As a result of these accidents 35 pilots, patients, and health care providers have lost their lives. Since these accidents have all occurred this year we are still waiting for formal NTSB accident reports to roll out. Even with out the final reports in hand the NTSB has just raised the stakes. On October 28th 2008 the NTSB published its “Most Wanted List” This list prioritizes its concerns, and begins to use its influence to make changes. I’ll give you one guess as to which topic was the #1 priority for the NTSB.
You guessed it the air medical industry is their concern, and they are looking back to their 2005 report for the fixes. It appears that the FAA is listening. They are currently floating a draft of rule changes. These changes are being reviewed by the industry before they get implemented early next year.
We are all well aware that there are no “Silver bullets” when it comes to aviation safety. The only way to make long lasting improvements is to change the culture. No longer can flight safety programs sit back and point fingers at other services. This is no longer a VFR vs. IFR issue. This is not a small vs. large service issue, and it is certainly not a hospital vs. stand alone service issue. This is an issue of such broad reaching importance that congress itself has returned its attention. Republican leaders have called for hearings to address air medical safety, and federal legislation has been enacted to try to force changes .
We recognize that a safety culture is not developed overnight, but it is out hope that leaders in the industry will work together with legislators, and standards bearers to instill a safety culture into the air medical industry.
The old coast guard adage of "We must go out, but we don't have to come back" no longer applies to any of the rescue fields.




